Politicians shouldn’t give life to the “Three second rule,” it’s killing us

 A recent Facebook posting bearing a government logo involving a prominent elected official and a group of schoolchildren shows how quickly children can be influenced by bad ideas without even knowing it.

The Facebook post featured a group of children called “Cool Kids,” who sat with the official in what was designed to be a lighthearted two-minute moment. However, a one-second statement by the official endorsing the debunked “three-second rule” is unnerving.

The video was well-intended and might have appeared harmless on the surface. Kids provided amusing responses to various questions, reminiscent of the classic TV show “Kids Say the Darndest Things.” One question, however, inadvertently took a concerning turn. When the official asked about the funniest thing they’d ever done, one African-American child said, “I ate something off the floor.” The response led to a chorus of laughter.

The elected official, perhaps aiming to join the laughter, injected a comment that raised eyebrows: “Oh no, three-second rule!” The implications of this moment are worth unpacking.

The “three-second rule,” a once widely accepted notion that food remains safe to consume if picked up within three seconds of falling on the ground, is not based on any scientific evidence. This has been debunked by numerous studies showing that bacterial transfer happens almost instantly upon contact with contaminated surfaces. While this rule might have been shrugged off as harmless folklore in the past, our understanding of pathogens and food safety has evolved significantly.

University studies have provided clear evidence that bacteria, including harmful pathogens like Salmonella and Bacillus cereus, can transfer swiftly from surfaces to food with remarkable speed—faster than three seconds.

The incident involving the elected official, irrespective of his intent, propagated the outdated notion of the three-second rule. This notion, as studies have proven, can compromise food safety and contribute to the spread of illness.

This incident takes on a deeper significance when considering the demographic context. The child who made the original comment was African-American, while the official hailed from a white Anglo-Saxon rural background. In marginalized communities where access to accurate health information might be limited, the endorsement of a debunked idea like the three-second rule can have lasting repercussions.

Under the rule, poor children were often taught that if they picked up dropped food fast enough and brushed off the dirt, it was safe to eat because “We’re made out of dirt anyway.” We know better now, but it’s hard to fight the myth if it’s a laughing matter with our leaders.

The incident highlights the responsibility that public figures bear when they choose to use impressionable children as a political backdrop to make themselves more likable. A thoughtless remark can do more damage than good, as well as help perpetuate false beliefs for generations.

The impact of viruses like COVID-19 has underscored the importance of hygiene and sanitation; it’s crucial to prioritize accurate information over outdated notions.

The bottom line is that there is no “three-second rule.”

In three seconds, the three-second rule comment should have been deleted altogether.